October 10th, 2006

Bony City

Posted in Architecture by Owen Rose

stone textures

Montréal limestone
Scottish red sandstone
Ohio sandstone
Indiana limestone
Grey Stanstead granite
New York blue sandstone
Queenston limestone

This is the variety of stone that you pass when you walk down rue Saint-Jacques (Saint James Street) in Old Montréal. Each façade has its own textures and rhythms. Stones are the bones of the earth. They are solid and timeless. I still remember my secondary school geography class teaching me about igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rock. I had no idea then how these old boulders could influence the character of a building, a street, or a neighbourhood.


Stone is more than prestigious; it is natural and durable. When the knowledge of concrete-cement disappeared at the end of the Roman Empire, not to be rediscovered until the 18th century, masonry construction was much of what we had left during the middle ages and the Renaissance. Stone elevated the airy Gothic cathedrals and solidified the staid Enlightenment palazzos. It is strong, solid, and reassuring.

Stone is also a texture that plays with light. It can contain deep shadows or small dimples. The sun bathes it from many angles during the Earth’s 365-day solar voyage. The orange-smooth autumn light softens craggy surfaces whilst the cold winter light is blocked by its stiffness. The sizes and configurations of rock walls are as varied as the street names of a city. Pass by a building and take a moment to touch and feel the walls. Wrap your knuckles over the rough surface. Cast your eyes skyward to notice the transition of materials and textures, shadows and light. Suddenly the monument breaks down into layers, voids, planes, and projections.

Not only is it in the air, but stone can also be under foot. Think of the great squares in Europe and the cobblestone streets of Old Montréal. In shades of grey and varied sizes and finishes, stone pavers and tiles animate the very ground we walk on.

Stone construction is a symbol of quality, craftsmanship, and care. Its historic sensibility is due to its durability. It is old because it has survived much longer than other building materials, but that does not mean that stone cannot be contemporary. Berlin uses it to create dynamic sidewalks. The inscribed red path is for cyclists; a subtle and effective way to integrate urban bike paths into a city’s transportation network. Copenhagen, one of Europe’s pedestrian capitals, is famous for the varied designs of its stone streets and public squares.

Berlin sidewalk with red bike lane

The granite floor of the Palais des congrès (Montréal Convention Centre) main entry hall is enlivened by the candy coloured façade obscuring the scattered pattern of greys and black. Perhaps this is the glass façade’s best effect, especially when it is -20C in January!

Hall - Palais des congrès de montréal


Tags: ,


Related Posts





You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site. RSS 2.0

2 comments

  1. Christopher DeWolf says:

    Fascinating, Owen. I remember looking in awe at the quality of the masonry in Brooklyn brownstones.

    Stone really fell out of favour in North America sometime in the 20th century, not only for use in buildings but for use on the ground, too. Any idea why? Montreal is a perfect example. Park walkways made of cheap asphalt, sidewalks made of cement. Neither of these are very durable so of course with our winters they require constant maintenance and are in generally poor condition.

    We seem to have passed a turning point, though. All of the new squares and sidewalks in the Quartier international are made of stone; the sidewalks at the new Pine/Park intersection and on newly-refurbished Bernard Street have solid granite curbs.

    October 12th, 2006 at 12:49 pm

  2. Owen Rose says:

    I believe that stone fell out of favour mainly because of the high up-front cost of purchasing and installing it. Over the last 50 years, Montréal has been awash in crumbling concrete and warped asphalt. At one point, I heard that stone was too difficult for our Montréal winters. Having visited the Scandinavian capitals, where it also snows, I see that this argument doesn’t hold up; therefore, the main reason is still budget. The Quartier international (QIM) and other projects are thankfully beginning to put stones and pedestrians back into favour. What’s old is new again.

    October 13th, 2006 at 8:31 am

Leave a comment