<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crassly Ste. Catherine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/</link>
	<description>Exploring urban life through word and photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edie Beale</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/comment-page-1/#comment-75574</link>
		<dc:creator>Edie Beale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/#comment-75574</guid>
		<description>I totally agree
I love the neon lights
I want my Montreal to sprakle at night
I want a giant anything anywhere in the city
At some point in time
Some idiot decided to turn this city
Into a village
I say if you like the country
Move there
Le Devoir sucks anyway
And with it&#039;s barely 50,000 readers
All living on the boring plateau
It doesn&#039;t have much influence now
does it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree<br />
I love the neon lights<br />
I want my Montreal to sprakle at night<br />
I want a giant anything anywhere in the city<br />
At some point in time<br />
Some idiot decided to turn this city<br />
Into a village<br />
I say if you like the country<br />
Move there<br />
Le Devoir sucks anyway<br />
And with it&#8217;s barely 50,000 readers<br />
All living on the boring plateau<br />
It doesn&#8217;t have much influence now<br />
does it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slutsky</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/comment-page-1/#comment-73889</link>
		<dc:creator>slutsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/#comment-73889</guid>
		<description>God... those pictures... so beautiful...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God&#8230; those pictures&#8230; so beautiful&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher DeWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/comment-page-1/#comment-73784</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher DeWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/#comment-73784</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree that an advertising screen per se wouldn&#039;t have much connection to the city (although the one at Ste. Catherine and Drummond does --- most of its ads are for downtown businesses). But the potential of video screens is so great that I think it would be a shame to squander this opportunity. Wouldn&#039;t it be entirely possible for a video screen, or at least a portion of the broadcasting on each commercial video screen, be devoted to local arts and artists? Imagine seeing a short film or visual art clip while walking down the street.

Hong Kong has hundreds of video screens but they all serve fairly distinct purposes. Many of them show mostly news with the occasional advertisement (no different than what you&#039;d find on, say, RDI or Newsworld). There&#039;s one outside a movie theatre that shows trailers for what&#039;s playing inside.

As for energy consumption, neon is actually more efficient than incandescent bulbs. But LED lights are most energy efficient of all: they use a tiny fraction of the energy a regular light bulb uses and they last pretty much forever. They can also can colours. They&#039;re pretty much the ideal solution for lighting up a street without using ghastly amounts of electricity. 

This photo at the top of my November post on urban light is one that demonstrates the potential of LED lighting perfectly. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2006/11/13/turn-on-the-lights/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is a Seoul department store that was built in the 1970s. Until recently it had a blank concrete facade. With the installation of energy-efficient LED lights on the exterior, it becomes something akin to a glowing lantern that changes colours and displays text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree that an advertising screen per se wouldn&#8217;t have much connection to the city (although the one at Ste. Catherine and Drummond does &#8212; most of its ads are for downtown businesses). But the potential of video screens is so great that I think it would be a shame to squander this opportunity. Wouldn&#8217;t it be entirely possible for a video screen, or at least a portion of the broadcasting on each commercial video screen, be devoted to local arts and artists? Imagine seeing a short film or visual art clip while walking down the street.</p>
<p>Hong Kong has hundreds of video screens but they all serve fairly distinct purposes. Many of them show mostly news with the occasional advertisement (no different than what you&#8217;d find on, say, RDI or Newsworld). There&#8217;s one outside a movie theatre that shows trailers for what&#8217;s playing inside.</p>
<p>As for energy consumption, neon is actually more efficient than incandescent bulbs. But LED lights are most energy efficient of all: they use a tiny fraction of the energy a regular light bulb uses and they last pretty much forever. They can also can colours. They&#8217;re pretty much the ideal solution for lighting up a street without using ghastly amounts of electricity. </p>
<p>This photo at the top of my November post on urban light is one that demonstrates the potential of LED lighting perfectly. <a href="http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2006/11/13/turn-on-the-lights/" rel="nofollow">This</a> is a Seoul department store that was built in the 1970s. Until recently it had a blank concrete facade. With the installation of energy-efficient LED lights on the exterior, it becomes something akin to a glowing lantern that changes colours and displays text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/comment-page-1/#comment-73760</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2007/07/21/1531/#comment-73760</guid>
		<description>I share your nostalgia for a time when Ste-Catherine was brighter, nosier and crasser (although my 21st Century mentality of fear of near-futrue environmental apocalypse makes me wince at the amount of energy all these neon signs would waste) I disagree with you on the video screen.  The difference between the video screen and most of the neon signs in these pictures is that the neon signs were fighting to get your attention so you would visit whatever exciting place of business was immediately below them.  The video screen however, will be a souless advertisement with no connection to the street below it or, if advertising a generic product, Montreal as a whole.  I feel there is a difference between a garish sign yelling at you to visit the strip joint, cafe, or theatre below it and a video screen yelling at you to buy the latest and biggest SUV or electric razor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share your nostalgia for a time when Ste-Catherine was brighter, nosier and crasser (although my 21st Century mentality of fear of near-futrue environmental apocalypse makes me wince at the amount of energy all these neon signs would waste) I disagree with you on the video screen.  The difference between the video screen and most of the neon signs in these pictures is that the neon signs were fighting to get your attention so you would visit whatever exciting place of business was immediately below them.  The video screen however, will be a souless advertisement with no connection to the street below it or, if advertising a generic product, Montreal as a whole.  I feel there is a difference between a garish sign yelling at you to visit the strip joint, cafe, or theatre below it and a video screen yelling at you to buy the latest and biggest SUV or electric razor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
