<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruelles With Potential</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2008/06/03/ruelles-with-potential/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2008/06/03/ruelles-with-potential/</link>
	<description>Exploring urban life through word and photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desmond Bliek</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2008/06/03/ruelles-with-potential/comment-page-1/#comment-166386</link>
		<dc:creator>Desmond Bliek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2008/06/03/ruelles-with-potential/#comment-166386</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Urban alleys certainly are an underused resource in Montreal; in many cases there also seems to be confusion (in terms of toponymy) as to whether one is dealing with a street or a lane, a fuzziness that probably clouds the consequences of these spaces in terms of urbanism, activity, and use.

As for Mount Royal Place, I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s private space, even though it&#039;s got a Ville de Montreal-issue street sign; years ago I tried to lock my bike to one of the lampposts in the lane, and got hustled out by one of the security guards from the Cours Mont-Royal mall complex.  Sometimes the best guide to whose space is whose seems to be just keeping your head down and looking at the lines in the concrete/pavers/asphalt, though one wishes there was a more welcoming way to tell what the space was about.

There was recently a Globe and Mail article about the sale of Toronto&#039;s first laneway house; the comments section revolved almost entirely around &#039;what is a laneway?&#039; and &#039;why would being on a laneway make a house particular or special?&#039;

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080523.re-laneway-0523/BNStory/RealEstate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Urban alleys certainly are an underused resource in Montreal; in many cases there also seems to be confusion (in terms of toponymy) as to whether one is dealing with a street or a lane, a fuzziness that probably clouds the consequences of these spaces in terms of urbanism, activity, and use.</p>
<p>As for Mount Royal Place, I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s private space, even though it&#8217;s got a Ville de Montreal-issue street sign; years ago I tried to lock my bike to one of the lampposts in the lane, and got hustled out by one of the security guards from the Cours Mont-Royal mall complex.  Sometimes the best guide to whose space is whose seems to be just keeping your head down and looking at the lines in the concrete/pavers/asphalt, though one wishes there was a more welcoming way to tell what the space was about.</p>
<p>There was recently a Globe and Mail article about the sale of Toronto&#8217;s first laneway house; the comments section revolved almost entirely around &#8216;what is a laneway?&#8217; and &#8216;why would being on a laneway make a house particular or special?&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080523.re-laneway-0523/BNStory/RealEstate" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080523.re-laneway-0523/BNStory/RealEstate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
