<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greening Expressways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2009/06/07/greening-expressways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2009/06/07/greening-expressways/</link>
	<description>Exploring urban life through word and photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher DeWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2009/06/07/greening-expressways/comment-page-1/#comment-288823</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher DeWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/?p=4580#comment-288823</guid>
		<description>I noticed that in Shanghai --- many elevated expressways were lined with planters. But you&#039;re right that it&#039;s just window dressing. What&#039;s really interesting about this idea is that it would probably have a meaningful effect on the surrounding area, both by reducing noise and by reducing air pollution. 

Of course the ideal situation would be to scrap the flyover altogether. HK has a terrible habit of building these things and I don&#039;t think they have much of an impact on traffic. Better-designed surface roads and intersections would probably be more useful to motorists and pedestrians alike. There&#039;s one flyover near my place and I fantasize about what it would be like if it was demolished and replaced with a row of big trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that in Shanghai &#8212; many elevated expressways were lined with planters. But you&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s just window dressing. What&#8217;s really interesting about this idea is that it would probably have a meaningful effect on the surrounding area, both by reducing noise and by reducing air pollution. </p>
<p>Of course the ideal situation would be to scrap the flyover altogether. HK has a terrible habit of building these things and I don&#8217;t think they have much of an impact on traffic. Better-designed surface roads and intersections would probably be more useful to motorists and pedestrians alike. There&#8217;s one flyover near my place and I fantasize about what it would be like if it was demolished and replaced with a row of big trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Soderstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/2009/06/07/greening-expressways/comment-page-1/#comment-288822</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Soderstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanphoto.net/blog/?p=4580#comment-288822</guid>
		<description>The green expressway reminds me of what I saw in Shanghai a few years ago.  Given the city&#039;s goal of making 35 per cent of its surface area &quot;green,&quot; every bush and tree is counted in the green tally.  This means that expressway landscaping gets a premium, and in some cases has become linear parks.  But from what I saw, most was window dressing, not useful green space.

Mary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The green expressway reminds me of what I saw in Shanghai a few years ago.  Given the city&#8217;s goal of making 35 per cent of its surface area &#8220;green,&#8221; every bush and tree is counted in the green tally.  This means that expressway landscaping gets a premium, and in some cases has become linear parks.  But from what I saw, most was window dressing, not useful green space.</p>
<p>Mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
